Halaman

Isnin, 13 Mac 2017

Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs


In 1943 Abraham Maslow, one of the founding fathers of humanist approaches to management, wrote an influential paper that set out five fundamental human needs needs and their hierarchical nature. They are quoted and taught so widely now that many people perceive this model as the definitive set of needs and do not look further.

The hierarchical effect

A key aspect of the model is the hierarchical nature of the needs. The lower the needs in the hierarchy, the more fundamental they are and the more a person will tend to abandon the higher needs in order to pay attention to sufficiently meeting the lower needs. For example, when we are ill, we care little for what others think about us: all we want is to get better.
Maslow called the first four needs 'D-need' as they are triggered when we have a deficit. Only self-actualization is a need that we seek for solely positive reasons. Maslow also called them 'instinctoid' as they are genetically programmed into us as essential for evolutionary survival. Loss of these during childhood can lead to trauma and lifelong fixation.
Click on the needs in the diagram below for more detail, or read below for a quick summary of each.



Note that in practice this hierarchy is only approximate and you do not have to have your physiologically needs fully satisfied before going on to seeking higher needs. In their global survey, for example, Tay and Diener (2011) found that people can be living in hazardous poverty and yet still derive much satisfaction from having social needs (belonging and esteem) fulfilled. 

The five needs

  • Physiological needs are to do with the maintenance of the human body. If we are unwell, then little else matters until we recover.
  • Safety needs are about putting a roof over our heads and keeping us from harm. If we are rich, strong and powerful, or have good friends, we can make ourselves safe.
  • Belonging needs introduce our tribal nature. If we are helpful and kind to others they will want us as friends.
  • Esteem needs are for a higher position within a group. If people respect us, we have greater power.
  • Self-actualization needs are to 'become what we are capable of becoming', which would our greatest achievement.

Three more needs

These are the needs that are most commonly discussed and used. In fact Maslow later added three more needs by splitting two of the above five needs.
Between esteem and self-actualization needs was added:
  • Need to know and understand, which explains the cognitive need of the academic.
  • The need for aesthetic beauty, which is the emotional need of the artist.
Self-actualization was divided into:
  • Self-actualization, which is realizing one's own potential, as above.
  • Transcendence, which is helping others to achieve their potential.

Trait Theories



These theories hold that happiness is a static characteristic of an individual, comparable to the color of one’s hair. One variant claims that happiness is largely genetic, some people are born to be happy, and others to be constitutionally depressive (e.g., Lykken, 1999). Another variant is that our early experiences program us to enjoy life or not. Cummins’ (1995) set-point theory assumes that we are all hardwired to feel reasonably happy (between 7 and 8 on scale 0-10) and that homeostatic mechanisms keep us around that level, unless extreme circumstances push us below or above.

Sabtu, 4 Mac 2017

Comparison Theories

These theories assume that happiness results from comparisons between notions of how life should be and how it actually is. The greater the gap between what one wants and what one has, the less happy one is (Michalos, 1985). In this theory, “wants” differ from the above mentioned “needs.” Firstly, wants are held consciously, while one may be unconscious of what one needs. Secondly, wants are social constructs and as such likely to vary across cultures, while needs are hardwired and universal. Thirdly, wants tend to be endless, while needs can be satisfied. This latter point implies that great happiness is not possible. If we always want more than we have, we will never get any happier. It is for this reason that the pursuit of happiness has been typified as a “hedonic treadmill” (Brickman & Campbell, 1971). Variants of this theory emphasize different standard of comparison and different mechanisms that inflate aspirations. See the lemma on “contentment” in this encyclopedia.